
Chris Extensive alleges corruption in ‘Rana-Dube concussion sub’ drama, Sunil Gavaskar claims India celebrity wasn’t concussed
The India Nationwide Cricket Staff’s determination to switch the younger pacer Harshit Rana because the all-rounder Shivam Dube’s concussion replace within the fourth T20I fit in opposition to England in Pune didn’t take a seat smartly with many cricketers, together with Indians.
The drama spread out when Jamie Overton’s fierce 141.5kph bouncer struck Shivam Dube at the helmet in India’s closing over ahead of being run out through the England captain Jos Buttler. Alternatively, Dube had already carried out sufficient injury to the England Nationwide Cricket Staff in Pune.
India’s determination to switch Shivam Dube with Harshit Rana in Pune sparks debate amongst cricket mavens
Shivam Dube (53 runs off 34 balls) had stitched an 87-run partnership with Hardik Pandya to assist the Males in Blue get better from 57 for 4 and submit 181 for 9 within the fourth T20I in opposition to England. However the true controversy erupted after the hosts opted to usher in medium-pace bowler Nitish Rana as a concussion replace for the all-rounder for the T20I series-deciding fit in Pune.
Apparently, India had batting all-rounder Ramandeep Singh at the bench, who appeared a greater are compatible as a like-for-like alternative for Dube, however they made up our minds to pick out Rana regardless of regulations obviously mandating a like-for-like alternative in such eventualities in world cricket.
Particularly, Ramandeep in brief stepped in as an alternative choice to Varun Chakravarthy throughout the fit. It sparked large controversy, with many England and India mavens criticizing the Indian workforce control for diminishing their symbol through the usage of such ways to win the sequence.
Chris Extensive slams ICC for ‘Bias and Corruption’ over Shivam Dube’s concussion replace
Now, former England cricketer and ICC fit referee Chris Extensive wondered the verdict to permit Harshit Rana as a concussion replace for Shivam Dube within the Pune T20I. The previous ICC fit referee wondered the governing frame and criticized the fit officers for now not fighting “bias and corruption” within the fit.
Particularly, Rana performed a key function in India’s series-winning 15-run victory over England in Pune through taking 3 wickets for 33 runs.
Chris Extensive posted, X: “Unbiased fit officers have been introduced in to forestall eventualities like this! Why is the ICC returning to the ‘dangerous previous days’ of bias and corruption?”
Unbiased fit officers have been introduced in to forestall eventualities like this! Why are the ICC returning to the ‘dangerous previous days’ of bias and corruption? #BCCI #ICC #bias #INDvENG
— Chris Extensive (@ChrisBroad3) February 1, 2025
In a separate social media submit, Extensive recommended that the ICC will have to mandate the usage of impartial fit referees. Responding to a question at the controversy, the Englishman wondered how an Indian fit referee may permit the sort of alternative. He wired that fit officers should stay unbiased to keep away from any bias.
Michael Vaughan and Kevin Pietersen name out fit officers over the row
In the meantime, the previous England captain Michael Vaughan additionally joined the controversy. Alternatively, Vaughan had not directly carried out it with a slightly of sarcasm thru retweets. He joked that “Harshit Rana goes to be some participant if he bats like Dube as smartly.”
He’s going to be some participant if he bats like Dube as smartly 😜😜 https://t.co/YD6JX87fm6
— Michael Vaughan (@MichaelVaughan) February 1, 2025
Then again, former England captain Kevin Pietersen referred to as the concussion substitution arguable, announcing it wasn’t a good alternative. The commentator mentioned that the fit referee will have to settle for his mistake and transfer ahead forward of the general sport in Mumbai.
Kevin Pietersen posted on X: “Concussion sub is reasonably the subject in all places right here atm, and my view is…it used to be NEVER a like-for-like alternative, and the fit referee will have to simply grasp his hand up and say he were given that one flawed. Finish of tournament for just right, and we transfer directly to any other nice conflict this night time.”
Concussion sub is reasonably the subject in all places right here atm and my view is…it used to be NEVER a like for like alternative and the fit referee will have to simply grasp his hand up and say he were given that one flawed.
Finish of tournament for just right and we transfer directly to any other nice conflict this night time. 💫— Kevin Pietersen🦏 (@KP24) February 2, 2025
Sunil Gavaskar slams Staff India for his or her arguable determination
Even Sunil Gavaskar criticized the Indian workforce control, announcing Shivam Dube wasn’t concussed as he batted till the top after being hit at the helmet. He wired that there used to be no “like-for-like” alternative between Dube and Harshit Rana.
Sunil Gavaskar wrote in his column for The Telegraph: “Even through essentially the most beneficiant stretching of the like-for-like time period, there used to be not anything such between Dube and Rana. With tongue firmly in cheek, one can say that they’re the similar top and feature the similar same old in fielding.
Differently, there may be not anything like for like so far as they’re involved. England has each explanation why to really feel carried out in. This Indian workforce is a wonderful workforce and does not want its wins to get tarnished through such acts.”
Average Rating