Global Cup 2023: Harbhajan Singh voices considerations over DRS in SA vs PAK mystery; Graeme Smith comes up with epic answer

Read Time:3 Minute, 3 Second

The ODI Global Cup 2023 noticed a passionate alternate of perspectives between former world cricketers Harbhajan Singh and Graeme Smith in regards to the Determination Overview Gadget (DRS). The talk was once ignited by means of a contentious DRS name throughout the new nail-biting come across between South Africa and Pakistan in Chennai.

On October 27, cricket fanatics witnessed an exciting contest that in the end ended with South Africa securing a slender one-wicket victory over Pakistan. On the other hand, it was once a selected DRS name involving South African bowler Tabraiz Shamsi that become the focal point.

The incident opened up throughout the forty sixth over of South Africa’s chase when Pakistani bowler Haris Rauf made a DRS attraction. The decision didn’t prefer Rauf, leaving Shamsi to live on because of an umpire’s name. Following the sport, Harbhajan took to his social media account to specific his frustration with DRS generation and its affect at the consequence of the fit.

“Dangerous umpiring and dangerous laws price Pakistan this recreation… @ICC will have to trade this rule… if the ball is hitting the stump, that’s out whether or not the umpire gave out or no longer out doesn’t topic… another way, what’s the usage of generation???” Harbhajan tweeted.

Dangerous umpiring and dangerous laws price Pakistan this recreation.. @ICC will have to trade this rule .. if the ball is hitting the stump that’s out whether or not umpire gave out or no longer out doesn’t topic.. another way what’s the usage of generation??? @TheRealPCB vs #SouthAfrica #worldcup

— Harbhajan Turbanator (@harbhajan_singh) October 27, 2023

Additionally READ: Twitter reactions – Aiden Markram, Tabraiz Shamsi shine as South Africa pip Pakistan in a mystery – Global Cup 2023

Graeme Smith’s reaction

According to Harbhajan’s critique, Smith joined the dialog, acknowledging Bhajji’s level. Smith identified that the advantage of doubt may be prolonged to Rassie van der Dussen, who was once given out in accordance with a marginal umpire’s name.

“Bhajji, @harbhajan_singh I think the similar as you on umpires name, however @Rassie72 and South Africa could have the similar feeling.?,” wrote Smith.

Bhajji, @harbhajan_singh I think the similar as you on umpires name, however @Rassie72 and South Africa could have the similar feeling.? https://t.co/lcTvm8zXD1

— Graeme Smith (@GraemeSmith49) October 27, 2023

Harbhajan’s counterargument

Harbhajan promptly replied to Smith’s publish, announcing his view at the topic. He contended that, in his opinion, Van der Dussen was once no longer out, however the generation was once there to present him out because the umpire had already made the verdict. Harbhajan went on to give an explanation for that the generation stored the umpire from making an mistaken name, quite than reaping rewards the participant, who may have probably received the sport for South Africa.

“He was once no longer out in step with me .. however tech was once there to present him out as umpire gave him out.. another way umpire would hv appeared dangerous for fallacious resolution.. they stored the umpire there no longer the participant who may have received the sport simply for SA,” tweeted Harbhajan.

He was once no longer out in step with me .. however tech was once there to present him out as umpire gave him out.. another way umpire would hv appeared dangerous for fallacious resolution.. they stored the umpire there no longer the participant who may have received the sport simply for SA https://t.co/8aZXAWjaZR percent.twitter.com/FMZCZ5MTY2

— Harbhajan Turbanator (@harbhajan_singh) October 27, 2023