SL vs AFG: Wanindu Hasaranga expresses frustration as umpire Lyndon Hannibal overlooks a an important no-ball within the Dambulla T20I

Read Time:2 Minute, 38 Second

Sri Lanka‘s newly appointed T20I captain, Wanindu Hasaranga, expressed his frustration and sadness following a debatable non-no-ball name made through umpire Lyndon Hannibal all the way through the 3rd T20I towards Afghanistan on the Rangiri Dambulla Global Stadium in Dambulla on Wednesday (February 21).

Dramatic flip within the final over in third T20I

In spite of having already secured the T20I collection, Sri Lanka confronted a difficult chase, requiring 210 runs to win. With 19 wanted off the final over, Sri Lanka seemed poised for victory as Kamindu Mendis struck two fours within the first 3 balls. Alternatively, the turning level got here at the fourth supply when a prime complete toss through Wafadar Momand above the waist top of Mendis was once deemed prison through Hannibal, who was once located at sq. leg.

Umpiring controversy shadows Sri Lanka’s end

Mendis, in spite of his request for a assessment, couldn’t avail it because of the most recent ICC taking part in stipulations, which limit critiques for anything else rather than attainable dismissals. Even if Mendis was once outdoor his crease, his crouched place urged that the ball would have nonetheless cleared his waist even supposing performed from the crease. The next supply was once referred to as a large, leaving Sri Lanka wanting 10 off the final two balls. Nonetheless, a dot at the penultimate supply and a last-ball six lowered the margin of defeat as Sri Lanka completed 3 runs brief at 206/6.

Additionally READ: Virat Kohli or Babar Azam? Mohammad Amir & Shaheen Afridi title the participant with perfect duvet force

Wanindu Hasaranga voices frustration towards Umpire

Hasaranga, visibly disenchanted through Hannibal’s resolution, criticized the umpiring error, emphasizing that such errors must no longer occur on the global stage. Moreover, Hasaranga expressed dissatisfaction with the assessment device, suggesting that the 3rd umpire must be capable to test all forms of no-balls, no longer simply the front-foot ones.

“That roughly factor shouldn’t occur in a global fit. If it were shut [to waist height], that’s no longer an issue. However a ball that’s going so prime… it could have hit the batsman’s head if it had long past just a little upper. If you’ll be able to’t see that, that umpire isn’t suited for global cricket. It will be a lot better if he did any other activity,” Hasaranga mentioned.

“There was once a state of affairs the place you want to assessment the ones calls prior to, however the ICC has removed that. Our batsmen attempted to study that. If the 3rd umpire is in a position to test the front-foot no-ball, he must test this sort of no-ball as smartly. There’s no explanation why they are able to’t. They didn’t do even that, so I’m no longer positive what was once occurring in his (the square-leg umpire’s) thoughts on the time,” the 26-year-old concluded.